The fresh modifications concerned brand new elimination of another products: 1, dos, 4, six, thirteen, fifteen, 18, 20, twenty-two, 23, twenty five and you may twenty-seven. Therefore, shortly after removing these items, Model 2(b) attained optimal philosophy that have god- of- fit indicator. This new FJS made up fifteen products, of which the global Squared Several Correlations (SMC) index are .60, demonstrating you to 60% of one’s difference is informed me from the hidden items. The latest correlation ranging from Basis step one and Factor dos was .66, it had been .80 between Foundation dos and you can Basis 3, and you can is actually .75 anywhere between Factor step 1 and you may Grounds step three, appearing the relationship involving the about three issues (Contour step one). Standard loads ranged away from .64 (goods 24) so you can .84 (goods twenty two).
To own Grounds step one, Ordinal’s alpha is actually .94 and you can McDonald’s Omega is actually .93. Factor 2 reached an Ordinal leader worth of .95 and you will McDonald’s Omega are .ninety five. And Foundation step three got a trustworthiness worth of .ninety to have Ordinal’s alpha and you may .88 to own McDonald’s Omega.
Very first, Pearson correlations had been carried out involving the FJS proportions and you will socio-market variables. Gender is on the FJS- Foundation dos (Spouse vigilance), in which feminine stated highest score (M= , SD = 6.15) than just men (Meters = 9.94, SD = 5.94). Yet not, to address this matter carefully, an enthusiastic invariance investigation was used, leading to conformity which have metric invariance having similar CFI beliefs (.92) for the non-evaluate model together with adjusted model step one. Simultaneously, the difference between design step 1 loads and design 2 intercepts and you may restrictions and you will model step three structural covariance differed by the philosophy below 0.05 (model step 1 = .92; model dos = .ninety and model 3 = .90). In the end kissbrides.com examine the link, more frequent Facebook explore was regarding an elevated number of Facebook jealousy (Desk 5).
The results indicated that their twenty seven products molded a beneficial about three-grounds design (Mate Activity, Partner Vigilance, and Partner’s Romantic and you will Sexual dating) which the fresh new alpha won’t increase if any goods try eliminated
Furthermore, the associations between FJS size and also the size of RPCS, self-esteem, and you will romantic envy was in fact checked-out. The outcome acquired indicated that each other RPCS-Commitment and RPCS-Prevention was in fact negatively regarding the about three FJS situations. In the long run, self-value and you will close jealousy coordinated absolutely to the three FJS issues (Desk 5). In addition, a great linear regression study is actually used to better consider the new predictive worth of the three FJS points with the RPCS overall score, self-regard, and you will romantic jealousy. Since revealed inside the Desk six, the latest RPCS overall score is greatest predict because of the Factor 2, we.elizabeth., mate vigilance, and self-esteem are ideal forecast from the Grounds step three, partner’s intimate and sexual dating, when you find yourself romantic envy try predict by all of the about three FJS products.
Twitter is considered the most commonly used social networking from inside the Colombia (Statcounter, 2020), so that as there are no surveys open to gauge the jealousy of Fb, an element of the goal of this research would be to adjust and you may examine the newest FJS that have a sample away from Colombian people. All of our conclusions exhibited the quick brand of the brand new FJS for the a great Colombian decide to try are legitimate and you will legitimate.
Years synchronised negatively with all about three FJS circumstances, anybody working in extended relationships reported straight down FJS-Foundation step one scores (spouse passion), while you are zero high correlations were revealed ranging from dating course and FJS Activities dos and you will 3
Regarding your basis framework, on one-hand, the structure of your scale is actually tested during the an enthusiastic EFA. However, this type of overall performance didn’t correspond with prior studies, where the construction was unifactorial (Demirtas-Madran, 2016; Muise et al., 2009). But not, regarding Pakistani type of FJS, the brand new basis build contains around three issues, titled by article authors the following: Low self-esteem, Inquisitiveness, and you may Infidelity (Iqbal & Jami, 2017). Additionally, in the form of the newest CFA, usually the one-grounds design proposed on modern adaptation (Muise mais aussi al., 2009), that has been ratified regarding the Turkish type (Demirtas-Madran, 2016) is actually checked. Although not, goodness-of-complement evaluation failed to let you know an acceptable match. For this reason, brand new multifactorial design obtained from the EFA are checked out, although design was not located to possess enough goodness of fit indicator.
